On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 4:07 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 01:01:06PM +0000, John Garry wrote: > > On 13/01/2020 11:42, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > The idiomatic approach appears to be for individual board vendors > > > to allocate IDs, you do end up with multiple IDs from multiple > > > vendors for the same thing. > > > But I am not sure how appropriate that same approach would be for some 3rd > > party memory part which we're simply wiring up on our board. Maybe it is. > > It seems to be quite common for Intel reference designs to assign > Intel IDs to non-Intel parts on the board (which is where I > became aware of this practice). Basically vendor of component in question is responsible for ID, but it seems they simple don't care. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/