On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:09:27AM +0000, John Garry wrote: > On 10/01/2020 19:31, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > PRP method is only for vendors to *test* the hardware in ACPI environment. > > The proper method is to allocate correct ACPI ID. > Yes, that would seem the proper thing to do. So the SPI NOR driver is based > on micron m25p80 and compatible string is "jedec,spi-nor", so I don't know > who should or would do this registration. The idiomatic approach appears to be for individual board vendors to allocate IDs, you do end up with multiple IDs from multiple vendors for the same thing. > BTW, Do any of these sensors you mention have any ACPI standardization? In general there's not really much standardizaiton for devices, the bindings that do exist aren't really centrally documented and the Windows standard is just to have the basic device registration in the firmware and do all properties based on quirking based on DMI information.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
