Hi Boris, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Thu, 9 Jan 2020 20:19:35 +0100: > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 19:39:42 +0100 (CET) > Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > Miquel, > > > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > > >> I suggest giving a name which indicates that we are actually emulating > > >> an SLC. Maybe MTD_SLC_EMULATION? > > >> Some MLC NANDs support SLC mode in hardware, MTD_MLC_IN_SLC_MODE reads like > > >> this feature. > > > > > > You're right. What about MTD_SLC_ON_MLC_EMULATION? > > > > Makes sense. > > > > >> The name is misleading. We don't do OOB IO on a SLC NAND, > > >> we emulate SLC. > > We should really replace those mtd_oob_ prefixes by something > more accurate like mtd_io_ at some point (those helpers can do more than > just read/write the OOB region). I think I have some WIP about this. Not the time for everything just during these vacations :p > > > > > > > What would you recommend? mtd_oob_io_emul_slc? > > > > Yes. Let's use "emul_slc" to indicate SLC emulation. > > How about mtd_io_emulated_slc()? Fine! Thanks, Miquèl ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/