On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 10:09:44AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Thu, 7 Nov > 2019 09:51:11 +0100: > > > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the > > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should > > never do something different based on this. > > I didn't know about this. Is this something new or has it been the rule > since the beginning? In the case, don't we need a Fixes tag here? It's been the way always, but as of a few kernel releases ago, debugfs is even more "fault-tolerant" of stuff like this. And there's no need for a "Fixes:" as this is just work to clean up the debugfs api and usage (I have a lot more work to do after these types of changes.) > > > Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> > > Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx> > > Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > [...] > > > + > > + d->dfs_emulate_io_failures = debugfs_create_file("tst_emulate_io_failures", > > + S_IWUSR, d->dfs_dir, > > + (void *)ubi_num, > > + &dfs_fops); > > + > > + d->dfs_emulate_power_cut = debugfs_create_file("tst_emulate_power_cut", > > + S_IWUSR, d->dfs_dir, > > + (void *)ubi_num, > > + &dfs_fops); > > Nitpick: I think we miss an empty line here. I can fix it when applying. Ah, oops, sorry about that. thanks, greg k-h ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/