Hi, On 04/10/19 12:04 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > The commit 4844ef80305d ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Add support for polling > status register") added checking for the status register error bits into > chip_good() to only return 1 if these bits are zero. Unfortunately, this > means that polling using chip_good() always reaches a time-out condition > when erase or program failure bits are set. I think the status register > error checking should be fully delegated to cfi_check_err_status() that > should return whether any error bits were set or not... > Please reword last sentence to drop "I think". Something like: Lets fully delegate the function of determining error condition to cfi_check_err_status() and make chip_good() only look for Device Ready/Busy condition. > Fixes: 4844ef80305d ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Add support for polling status register") > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > Index: linux/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c > =================================================================== > --- linux.orig/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c > +++ linux/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c > @@ -123,14 +123,14 @@ static int cfi_use_status_reg(struct cfi > (extp->SoftwareFeatures & poll_mask) == CFI_POLL_STATUS_REG; > } > > -static void cfi_check_err_status(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, > - unsigned long adr) > +static int cfi_check_err_status(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, > + unsigned long adr) > { > struct cfi_private *cfi = map->fldrv_priv; > map_word status; > > if (!cfi_use_status_reg(cfi)) > - return; > + return 0; > > cfi_send_gen_cmd(0x70, cfi->addr_unlock1, chip->start, map, cfi, > cfi->device_type, NULL); > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static void cfi_check_err_status(struct > > /* The error bits are invalid while the chip's busy */ > if (!map_word_bitsset(map, status, CMD(CFI_SR_DRB))) > - return; > + return 0; > > if (map_word_bitsset(map, status, CMD(0x3a))) { > unsigned long chipstatus = MERGESTATUS(status); > @@ -155,7 +155,9 @@ static void cfi_check_err_status(struct > if (chipstatus & CFI_SR_SLSB) > pr_err("%s sector write protected, status %lx\n", > map->name, chipstatus); > + return 1; > } > + return 0; > } > > /* #define DEBUG_CFI_FEATURES */ > @@ -852,20 +854,16 @@ static int __xipram chip_good(struct map > > if (cfi_use_status_reg(cfi)) { > map_word ready = CMD(CFI_SR_DRB); > - map_word err = CMD(CFI_SR_PSB | CFI_SR_ESB); > + > /* > * For chips that support status register, check device > - * ready bit and Erase/Program status bit to know if > - * operation succeeded. > + * ready bit > */ > cfi_send_gen_cmd(0x70, cfi->addr_unlock1, chip->start, map, cfi, > cfi->device_type, NULL); > curd = map_read(map, addr); > > - if (map_word_andequal(map, curd, ready, ready)) > - return !map_word_bitsset(map, curd, err); > - > - return 0; > + return map_word_andequal(map, curd, ready, ready); > } > > oldd = map_read(map, addr); > @@ -1703,8 +1701,11 @@ static int __xipram do_write_oneword_onc Nit: for some reason, your diff has function names truncated abruptly which makes its slightly harder to locate the context. I use git format-patch that produces better readable contexts. > break; > } > > - if (chip_good(map, chip, adr, datum)) > + if (chip_good(map, chip, adr, datum)) { > + if (cfi_check_err_status(map, chip, adr)) > + ret = -EIO; > break; > + } > > /* Latency issues. Drop the lock, wait a while and retry */ > UDELAY(map, chip, adr, 1); > @@ -1777,7 +1778,6 @@ static int __xipram do_write_oneword_ret > ret = do_write_oneword_once(map, chip, adr, datum, mode, cfi); > if (ret) { > /* reset on all failures. */ > - cfi_check_err_status(map, chip, adr); > map_write(map, CMD(0xF0), chip->start); > /* FIXME - should have reset delay before continuing */ > > @@ -1974,12 +1974,17 @@ static int __xipram do_write_buffer_wait > */ > if (time_after(jiffies, timeo) && > !chip_good(map, chip, adr, datum)) { > + pr_warn("MTD %s(): software timeout, address:0x%.8lx.\n", > + __func__, adr); Since we are returning an error condition, this should be pr_err() (I know that rest of the file does not follow this convention, but lets make sure new code does) Rest looks fine to me. Thanks for the patch! -- Regards Vignesh ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/