Re: A big issue of NAND fragmentation

[Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>]

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "JH" <jupiter.hce@xxxxxxxxx>
> An: "Richard Weinberger" <richard.weinberger@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Gesendet: Freitag, 6. September 2019 08:03:55
> Betreff: Re: A big issue of NAND fragmentation
> 
> Yes, I use UBIFS, was your word "force" means "write" or did you
> allude there would be an alternative to avoid forcing UBIFS persist
> 250 bytes?
> 
> Waiting for out of space would be too risk, alternatively, I should
> have a UBIFS partition for the data storage, if it runs out of space,
> it won't impact the root file system.
> 

No, by force I mean forcing the filesystem to persist the data.
For example by using fsync(),fdatasync(), O_SYNC or a sync mounted
filesystem.
If you don't do this, data will be cached and can be packed
later upon write-back.

Thanks,
//richard

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/