On 20/08/2019 17:58, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 03:09:15PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
On 19/08/2019 05:39, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
On 16/08/19 3:50 PM, John Garry wrote:
About the child spi flash devices, is the recommendation to just use
PRP0001 HID and "jedec,spi-nor" compatible?
I am not quite familiar with ACPI systems, but child flash device should
use "jedec,spi-nor" as compatible.
Right, so to use SPI MEM framework, it looks like I will have to use PRP0001
and "jedec,spi-nor" as compatible.
My reluctance in using PRP0001 and compatible "jedec,spi-nor" is how other
OS can understand this.
Hi Mark,
Last I heard Windows wasn't doing anything with PRP0001 but on the other
hand the idiomatic way to handle this for ACPI is as far as I can tell
to have what is essentially a board file loaded based on DMI information
without any real enumerability so there's no real conflict between the
two methods.
Fine, I'll consider this alt method further.
Thanks,
John
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
