On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 03:09:15PM +0100, John Garry wrote: > On 19/08/2019 05:39, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: > > On 16/08/19 3:50 PM, John Garry wrote: > > > About the child spi flash devices, is the recommendation to just use > > > PRP0001 HID and "jedec,spi-nor" compatible? > > I am not quite familiar with ACPI systems, but child flash device should > > use "jedec,spi-nor" as compatible. > Right, so to use SPI MEM framework, it looks like I will have to use PRP0001 > and "jedec,spi-nor" as compatible. > My reluctance in using PRP0001 and compatible "jedec,spi-nor" is how other > OS can understand this. Last I heard Windows wasn't doing anything with PRP0001 but on the other hand the idiomatic way to handle this for ACPI is as far as I can tell to have what is essentially a board file loaded based on DMI information without any real enumerability so there's no real conflict between the two methods.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
