Re: [PATCH] mtd: spinand: micron: add support for MT29F1G01AAADD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marco,

Marco Felsch <m.felsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon, 19 Aug 2019
15:30:42 +0200:

> Hi Miquel,
> 
> On 19-08-19 10:17, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Marco,
> > 
> > Marco Felsch <m.felsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Wed, 14 Aug 2019
> > 10:22:32 +0200:
> >   
> > > The MT29F1G01AAADD is a single die, SLC based SPI NAND. It has a
> > > capacity of 1Gb and supports 4-bit ECC. The datasheet can be found [1].
> > > 
> > > Unfortunatly the linked device is marked as EoL, but I will expect that
> > > the MT29F1G01AAADDH4-ITX behaves the same way.
> > > 
> > > [1] https://datasheet.octopart.com/ \
> > >       MT29F1G01AAADDH4-IT:D-Micron-datasheet-11572380.pdf
> > > 
> > > Cc: Peter Pan <peterpandong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mtd/nand/spi/micron.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/micron.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/micron.c
> > > index 7d7b1f7fcf71..9d63450afc69 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/micron.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/micron.c
> > > @@ -34,6 +34,18 @@ static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(update_cache_variants,
> > >  		SPINAND_PROG_LOAD_X4(false, 0, NULL, 0),
> > >  		SPINAND_PROG_LOAD(false, 0, NULL, 0));
> > >  
> > > +static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(read_cache_variants_mt29f1g01aaadd,
> > > +		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X4_OP(0, 1, NULL, 0),
> > > +		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X2_OP(0, 1, NULL, 0),
> > > +		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP(true, 0, 1, NULL, 0),
> > > +		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP(false, 0, 1, NULL, 0));
> > > +
> > > +static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(write_cache_variants_mt29f1g01aaadd,
> > > +		SPINAND_PROG_LOAD(true, 0, NULL, 0));
> > > +
> > > +static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(update_cache_variants_mt29f1g01aaadd,
> > > +		SPINAND_PROG_LOAD(false, 0, NULL, 0));
> > > +
> > >  static int mt29f2g01abagd_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
> > >  					struct mtd_oob_region *region)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -90,6 +102,52 @@ static int mt29f2g01abagd_ecc_get_status(struct spinand_device *spinand,
> > >  	return -EINVAL;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static int mt29f1g01aaadd_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
> > > +					struct mtd_oob_region *region)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (section > 3)
> > > +		return -ERANGE;
> > > +
> > > +	region->offset = (section * 0x10) + 8;  
> > 
> > Any reason to use hex here?         ^
> > 
> > If not I would prefer decimal numbers.  
> 
> Since the datasheet describe it in hex to.
> 
> Can you have a look on [1] table 11? May we do something like:
> 
> 	region->offset = (section * 0x10) + 0x8;
> 
> [1] https://datasheet.octopart.com/MT29F1G01AAADDH4-IT:D-Micron-datasheet-11572380.pdf
> 
> > 
> > Otherwise looks fine.  
> 
> Anyway I can change the above code to use only decimal values if you
> like it more.

I think it is better to reserve hexadecimal values to register
operations. Please translate into decimal.

Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux