Re: GPMI iMX6ull timeout on DMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/8/19 12:50 pm, Greg Ungerer wrote:
On 9/8/19 11:59 pm, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 23:57:08 +1000
Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9/8/19 5:32 pm, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 16:55:22 +1000
Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9/8/19 4:23 pm, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 15:20:52 +1000
Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9/8/19 2:36 am, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 15:51:05 +1000
Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2/8/19 10:51 pm, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 22:34:57 +1000
Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 31/7/19 4:28 pm, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:05:44 +1000
Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 30/7/19 6:38 pm, Miquel Raynal wrote:
Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:06:55 +1000:
On 30/7/19 10:41 am, Greg Ungerer wrote:
On 30/7/19 10:28 am, Greg Ungerer wrote:
On 29/7/19 10:47 pm, Miquel Raynal wrote:
Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon, 29 Jul 2019 22:33:56 +1000:
On 29/7/19 6:36 pm, Miquel Raynal wrote:
Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:41:51 +1000:
[snip]
Note that this was generated on a normal boot up (not failure).

The values looks good. Can you try with the below diff applied?
--->8---
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
index 334fe3130285..9771f6a82abe 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
@@ -721,12 +721,10 @@ static void gpmi_nfc_apply_timings(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
              writel(hw->ctrl1n, gpmi_regs + HW_GPMI_CTRL1_SET);
              /* Wait 64 clock cycles before using the GPMI after enabling the DLL */
-       dll_wait_time_us = USEC_PER_SEC / hw->clk_rate * 64;
-       if (!dll_wait_time_us)
-               dll_wait_time_us = 1;
+       dll_wait_time_us = DIV_ROUND_UP(USEC_PER_SEC * 64, hw->clk_rate);
              /* Wait for the DLL to settle. */
-       udelay(dll_wait_time_us);
+       usleep_range(dll_wait_time_us, dll_wait_time_us * 10);
       }
       static int gpmi_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int chipnr,

Eventually it failed, in the same way with with same errors.
Took quite a while, over 600 boot cycles.

Note also that I had to hand merge the changes, since in 5.1.14 that
gpmi_nfc_apply_timings() is in gpmi-lib.c. But it was trivial to do.

Oh well. I guess the next thing to do would be to dump the timing regs
and clk rate that are set by the bootloader (before the driver override
them) or those applied by an older kernel (one that didn't have that
issue).

Is this useful?

Hm, looks like it's configured in mode 0, so no, it's not super useful.
Can you try booting an older kernel (one that didn't have the
->setup_data_interface() hook implemented).

Ok. I went back from 5.1 and the first kernel I could find that
returned no grep hits for "setup_data_interface" was 4.16.

So I built for my target with that and added similar trace to dump
the hardware register settings for that. Debug output looks like
this now for it:

...
drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c(807): gpmi_get_clks()
      clk_get_rate(r->clock[0])=22000000
drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c(1054): gpmi_begin()
      HW_GPMI_TIMING0=0x00010203
      HW_GPMI_TIMING1=0x05000000
nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xda
nand: Micron MT29F2G08ABAEAWP
nand: 256 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c(966): enable_edo_mode()
      clk_get_rate(r->clock[0])=99000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: enable the asynchronous EDO mode 5
drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c(1054): gpmi_begin()
      HW_GPMI_TIMING0=0x00010101

TIMING0 match the one you have with 5.1 kernels.
      HW_GPMI_TIMING1=0x90000000

And we even have a bigger timeout value in 5.1 (0xe0000000), so we
should be all safe WRT to timings in TIMING{0,1}.

Can you dump CTRL1?

drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c(1054): gpmi_begin()
     HW_GPMI_TIMING0=0x00010101
     HW_GPMI_TIMING1=0x90000000
     HW_GPMI_CTRL1_SET=0x01c4800c

The read/write delay fields seem to match, but there are a few more
fields set in this version:
- DECOUPLE_CS
- BCH_MODE
- DEV_RESET
- CTRL1_ATA_IRQRDY_POLARITY__ACTIVEHIGH

Looks like those fields are not explicitly set in the gpmi_begin()
patch, but maybe you dumped CTRL1. Would you mind sharing your patch?

Attached.

Hm, you should read CTRL1 instead of CTRL1_SET which I guess is WO.


Here is 2 sets of trace dumping the same set of registers.
This first is on the linux-4.16 kernel:

Linux version 4.16.0 (gerg@goober) (gcc version 4.8.3 (GCC)) #9 Mon Aug 12 10:46:25 AEST 2019
...
nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xda
nand: Micron MT29F2G08ABAEAWP
nand: 256 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: use legacy bch geometry
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: enable the asynchronous EDO mode 5
drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c(1110): gpmi_begin()
   HW_GPMI_TIMING0=0x00010101
   HW_GPMI_TIMING1=0x90000000
   HW_GPMI_CTRL1=0x01c6800c
   r->clock[0]=99000000
Scanning device for bad blocks
5 ofpart partitions found on MTD device gpmi-nand
Creating 5 MTD partitions on "gpmi-nand":
0x000000000000-0x000000500000 : "u-boot"
0x000000500000-0x000000600000 : "u-boot-env"
0x000000600000-0x000000800000 : "log"
0x000000800000-0x000010000000 : "flash"
0x000000000000-0x000010000000 : "all"
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: driver registered.
...


And then this is from the 5.1.14 kernel:

Linux version 5.1.14 (gerg@goober) (gcc version 4.8.3 (GCC)) #25 Mon Aug 12 10:49:21 AEST 2019
...
nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xda
nand: Micron MT29F2G08ABAEAWP
nand: 256 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c(510): gpmi_nfc_apply_timings()
   HW_GPMI_TIMING0=0x00020101
   HW_GPMI_TIMING1=0xb0000000
   HW_GPMI_CTRL1=0x0104000c
   r->clock[0]=22000000
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c(510): gpmi_nfc_apply_timings()
   HW_GPMI_TIMING0=0x00010101
   HW_GPMI_TIMING1=0xe0000000
   HW_GPMI_CTRL1=0x01c6800c
   r->clock[0]=99000000
Scanning device for bad blocks
5 fixed-partitions partitions found on MTD device gpmi-nand
Creating 5 MTD partitions on "gpmi-nand":
0x000000000000-0x000000500000 : "u-boot"
0x000000500000-0x000000600000 : "u-boot-env"
0x000000600000-0x000000800000 : "log"
0x000000800000-0x000010000000 : "flash"
0x000000000000-0x000010000000 : "all"
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: driver registered.


Register settings read back from the registers themselves at the end
of the respective setting routines (so gpmi_begin() for 4.16 and
gpmi_nfc_apply_timings() for 5.1.14)

So something I notice here is that gpmi_nfc_apply_timings() is
being run multiple times. When I look back to the original
failure dumps the first error ("DMA timeout, last DMA") occurred
after the device type messages ("nand: 256 MiB, SLC,..."). Is it
happening with that higher clock rate still set?

Looks like that is not the case...

...
nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xda
nand: Micron MT29F2G08ABAEAWP
nand: 256 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c(510): gpmi_nfc_apply_timings()
  HW_GPMI_TIMING0=0x00020101
  HW_GPMI_TIMING1=0xb0000000
  HW_GPMI_CTRL1=0x0104000c
  r->clock[0]=22000000
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-lib.c(510): gpmi_nfc_apply_timings()
  HW_GPMI_TIMING0=0x00010101
  HW_GPMI_TIMING1=0xe0000000
  HW_GPMI_CTRL1=0x01c6800c
  r->clock[0]=99000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: DMA timeout, last DMA
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: Show GPMI registers :
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x000 : 0x20830002
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x010 : 0x00000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x020 : 0x00000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x030 : 0x00000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x040 : 0x00000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x050 : 0x00000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x060 : 0x01c6800c
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x070 : 0x00010101
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x080 : 0xe0000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x090 : 0x23023336
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x0a0 : 0x000001ee
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x0b0 : 0xff000001
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x0c0 : 0x00000100
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x0d0 : 0x05020000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: Show BCH registers :
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x000 : 0x00000100
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x010 : 0x00000010
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x020 : 0x00000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x030 : 0x00000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x040 : 0x00000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x050 : 0x00000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x060 : 0x00000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x070 : 0x00000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x080 : 0x030a2080
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x090 : 0x083e2080
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x0a0 : 0x070a4080
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x0b0 : 0x10da4080
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x0c0 : 0x070a4080
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x0d0 : 0x10da4080
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x0e0 : 0x070a4080
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x0f0 : 0x10da4080
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x100 : 0x00000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x110 : 0x00000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x120 : 0x00000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x130 : 0x00000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x140 : 0x00000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x150 : 0x20484342
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x160 : 0x01000000
gpmi-nand 1806000.gpmi-nand: offset 0x170 : 0x00000000

Regards
Greg



______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux