Hi Paul, One question below. Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Sat, 29 Jun 2019 03:22:48 +0200: > If MTD_NAND_JZ4780 is y and MTD_NAND_JZ4780_BCH is m, > which select CONFIG_MTD_NAND_INGENIC_ECC to m, building fails: > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand.o: In function `ingenic_nand_remove': > ingenic_nand.c:(.text+0x177): undefined reference to `ingenic_ecc_release' > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand.o: In function `ingenic_nand_ecc_correct': > ingenic_nand.c:(.text+0x2ee): undefined reference to `ingenic_ecc_correct' > > To fix that, the ingenic_nand and ingenic_ecc modules have been fused > into one single module. > - The ingenic_ecc.c code is now compiled in only if > $(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_INGENIC_ECC) is set. This is now a boolean instead > of tristate. > - To avoid changing the module name, the ingenic_nand.c file is moved to > ingenic_nand_drv.c. Then the module name is still ingenic_nand. > - Since ingenic_ecc.c is no more a module, the module-specific macros > have been dropped, and the functions are no more exported for use by > the ingenic_nand driver. I am fine with this approach. > > Fixes: 15de8c6efd0e ("mtd: rawnand: ingenic: Separate top-level and SoC specific code") > Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Kconfig | 2 +- > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile | 4 +++- > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_ecc.c | 9 --------- > .../raw/ingenic/{ingenic_nand.c => ingenic_nand_drv.c} | 0 > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > rename drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/{ingenic_nand.c => ingenic_nand_drv.c} (100%) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Kconfig > index 19a96ce515c1..66b7cffdb0c2 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Kconfig > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ config MTD_NAND_JZ4780 > if MTD_NAND_JZ4780 > > config MTD_NAND_INGENIC_ECC > - tristate > + bool > > config MTD_NAND_JZ4740_ECC > tristate "Hardware BCH support for JZ4740 SoC" > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile > index 1ac4f455baea..b63d36889263 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile > @@ -2,7 +2,9 @@ > obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4740) += jz4740_nand.o > obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4780) += ingenic_nand.o > > -obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_INGENIC_ECC) += ingenic_ecc.o > +ingenic_nand-y += ingenic_nand_drv.o > +ingenic_nand-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_INGENIC_ECC) += ingenic_ecc.o > + > obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4740_ECC) += jz4740_ecc.o > obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4725B_BCH) += jz4725b_bch.o > obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4780_BCH) += jz4780_bch.o > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_ecc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_ecc.c > index d3e085c5685a..c954189606f6 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_ecc.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_ecc.c > @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ int ingenic_ecc_calculate(struct ingenic_ecc *ecc, > { > return ecc->ops->calculate(ecc, params, buf, ecc_code); > } > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(ingenic_ecc_calculate); > > /** > * ingenic_ecc_correct() - detect and correct bit errors > @@ -51,7 +50,6 @@ int ingenic_ecc_correct(struct ingenic_ecc *ecc, > { > return ecc->ops->correct(ecc, params, buf, ecc_code); > } > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(ingenic_ecc_correct); > > /** > * ingenic_ecc_get() - get the ECC controller device > @@ -111,7 +109,6 @@ struct ingenic_ecc *of_ingenic_ecc_get(struct device_node *of_node) > } > return ecc; > } > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_ingenic_ecc_get); > > /** > * ingenic_ecc_release() - release the ECC controller device > @@ -122,7 +119,6 @@ void ingenic_ecc_release(struct ingenic_ecc *ecc) > clk_disable_unprepare(ecc->clk); > put_device(ecc->dev); > } > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(ingenic_ecc_release); > > int ingenic_ecc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > @@ -159,8 +155,3 @@ int ingenic_ecc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(ingenic_ecc_probe); Any reason to keep this one? Thanks, Miquèl ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/