Hello Vignesh, Thanks for your review comments. On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 6:14 PM Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 12-Jun-19 4:17 PM, Sagar Shrikant Kadam wrote: > [...] > > > @@ -4129,7 +4137,7 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const char *name, > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > > > - if (nor->addr_width) { > > + if (nor->addr_width && JEDEC_MFR(info) != SNOR_MFR_ISSI) { > > /* already configured from SFDP */ > > Hmm, why would you want to ignore addr_width that's read from SFDP table? The SFDP table for ISSI device considered here, has addr_width set to 3 byte, and the flash considered here is 32MB. With 3 byte address width we won't be able to access flash memories higher address range. Hence I have ignored the addr width from SFDP. I have verified that with 3 byte address width, the flascp util fails while verifying the written data. Please let me know your views on this? BR, Sagar Kadam > Regards > Vignesh > > > > } else if (info->addr_width) { > > nor->addr_width = info->addr_width; > > diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h > > index b3d360b..ff13297 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h > > +++ b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h > > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ > > #define SNOR_MFR_ATMEL CFI_MFR_ATMEL > > #define SNOR_MFR_GIGADEVICE 0xc8 > > #define SNOR_MFR_INTEL CFI_MFR_INTEL > > +#define SNOR_MFR_ISSI 0x9d /* ISSI */ > > #define SNOR_MFR_ST CFI_MFR_ST /* ST Micro */ > > #define SNOR_MFR_MICRON CFI_MFR_MICRON /* Micron */ > > #define SNOR_MFR_MACRONIX CFI_MFR_MACRONIX > > ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/