On 14/06/19 8:53 AM, Chris Packham wrote: > Hi All, > > I think this may have got lost in the change of maintainer for mtd. > I do have this in my queue of patches for mtd/next and will forward to Miquel once he is back. > On 22/05/19 12:06 PM, Chris Packham wrote: >> Because PPB unlocking unlocks the whole chip cfi_ppb_unlock() needs to >> remember the locked status for each sector so it can re-lock the >> unaddressed sectors. Dynamically calculate the maximum number of sectors >> rather than using a hardcoded value that is too small for larger chips. >> >> Tested with Spansion S29GL01GS11TFI flash device. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx> Regards Vignesh >> --- >> drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c | 13 ++++++++----- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c >> index c8fa5906bdf9..a1a7d334aa82 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c >> @@ -2533,8 +2533,6 @@ struct ppb_lock { >> int locked; >> }; >> >> -#define MAX_SECTORS 512 >> - >> #define DO_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_LOCK ((void *)1) >> #define DO_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_UNLOCK ((void *)2) >> #define DO_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_GETLOCK ((void *)3) >> @@ -2633,6 +2631,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused cfi_ppb_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, >> int i; >> int sectors; >> int ret; >> + int max_sectors; >> >> /* >> * PPB unlocking always unlocks all sectors of the flash chip. >> @@ -2640,7 +2639,11 @@ static int __maybe_unused cfi_ppb_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, >> * first check the locking status of all sectors and save >> * it for future use. >> */ >> - sect = kcalloc(MAX_SECTORS, sizeof(struct ppb_lock), GFP_KERNEL); >> + max_sectors = 0; >> + for (i = 0; i < mtd->numeraseregions; i++) >> + max_sectors += regions[i].numblocks; >> + >> + sect = kcalloc(max_sectors, sizeof(struct ppb_lock), GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!sect) >> return -ENOMEM; >> >> @@ -2689,9 +2692,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused cfi_ppb_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, >> } >> >> sectors++; >> - if (sectors >= MAX_SECTORS) { >> + if (sectors >= max_sectors) { >> printk(KERN_ERR "Only %d sectors for PPB locking supported!\n", >> - MAX_SECTORS); >> + max_sectors); >> kfree(sect); >> return -EINVAL; >> } >> > -- Regards Vignesh ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/