On 06.06.19 10:39, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 08:27:11 +0000 > Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi Emil, >> >> On 04.06.19 10:01, Emil Lenngren wrote: >>> Hi Miquel, >>> >>>> static const struct spinand_info macronix_spinand_table[] = { >>>> SPINAND_INFO("MX35LF1GE4AB", 0x12, >>>> - NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 64, 64, 1024, 1, 1, 1), >>>> + NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 64, 64, 1024, 40, 1, 1, 1), >>>> NAND_ECCREQ(4, 512), >>>> SPINAND_INFO_OP_VARIANTS(&read_cache_variants, >>>> &write_cache_variants, >>>> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static const struct spinand_info macronix_spinand_table[] = { >>>> SPINAND_ECCINFO(&mx35lfxge4ab_ooblayout, >>>> mx35lf1ge4ab_ecc_get_status)), >>>> SPINAND_INFO("MX35LF2GE4AB", 0x22, >>>> - NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 64, 64, 2048, 2, 1, 1), >>>> + NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 64, 64, 2048, 20, 2, 1, 1), >>>> NAND_ECCREQ(4, 512), >>> >>> Maybe a bit late to the discussion, but shouldn't 20 and 40 be swapped >>> here, i.e. isn't it the larger flash that has more max bad blocks than >>> the smaller one? >> >> I think Miquel is out of office for some days, so I just checked and you >> are right, the maximum number of bad blocks should be swapped. >> >> Actually there is also a wrong value in the GigaDevice driver: For the >> GD5F4GQ4xA it should be 80 instead of 40. > > Haven't checked the datasheet, but keep in mind that this is the max > number of eraseblock per LUN. The datasheet gives 20 for the 1G type and 40 for the 2G type. Both types have only one LUN. Only the 2G type has 2 planes, but that shouldn't make a difference, right? ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/