Hi Miquel, > static const struct spinand_info macronix_spinand_table[] = { > SPINAND_INFO("MX35LF1GE4AB", 0x12, > - NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 64, 64, 1024, 1, 1, 1), > + NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 64, 64, 1024, 40, 1, 1, 1), > NAND_ECCREQ(4, 512), > SPINAND_INFO_OP_VARIANTS(&read_cache_variants, > &write_cache_variants, > @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static const struct spinand_info macronix_spinand_table[] = { > SPINAND_ECCINFO(&mx35lfxge4ab_ooblayout, > mx35lf1ge4ab_ecc_get_status)), > SPINAND_INFO("MX35LF2GE4AB", 0x22, > - NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 64, 64, 2048, 2, 1, 1), > + NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 64, 64, 2048, 20, 2, 1, 1), > NAND_ECCREQ(4, 512), Maybe a bit late to the discussion, but shouldn't 20 and 40 be swapped here, i.e. isn't it the larger flash that has more max bad blocks than the smaller one? /Emil ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/