On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 10:21 PM Han Xu <han.xu@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > Found such issue with lock debugging. Running bonnie++ on QSPI with UBIFS. > > Erasing 64 Kibyte @ 1ff0000 -- 100 % complete > [ 129.575631] ubi0: attaching mtd0 > [ 129.620067] ubi0: scanning is finished > [ 129.623888] ubi0: empty MTD device detected > [ 129.723031] ubi0: attached mtd0 (name "30bb0000.spi", size 32 MiB) > [ 129.729289] ubi0: PEB size: 65536 bytes (64 KiB), LEB size: 65408 bytes > [ 129.735994] ubi0: min./max. I/O unit sizes: 1/256, sub-page size 1 > [ 129.742267] ubi0: VID header offset: 64 (aligned 64), data offset: 128 > [ 129.748915] ubi0: good PEBs: 512, bad PEBs: 0, corrupted PEBs: 0 > [ 129.755026] ubi0: user volume: 0, internal volumes: 1, max. volumes count: 128 > [ 129.762365] ubi0: max/mean erase counter: 0/0, WL threshold: 4096, image sequence number: 445061296 > [ 129.771508] ubi0: available PEBs: 508, total reserved PEBs: 4, PEBs reserved for bad PEB handling: 0 > [ 129.781182] ubi0: background thread "ubi_bgt0d" started, PID 516 > UBI device number 0, total 512 LEBs (33488896 bytes, 31.9 MiB), available 508 LEBs (33227264 bytes, 31.6 MiB), LEB size 65408 bytes (63.8 KiB) > Set volume size to 33227264 > Volume ID 0, size 508 LEBs (33227264 bytes, 31.6 MiB), LEB size 65408 bytes (63.8 KiB), dynamic, name "test", alignment 1 > [ 132.036227] UBIFS (ubi0:0): default file-system created > [ 132.046036] UBIFS (ubi0:0): Mounting in unauthenticated mode > [ 132.052526] UBIFS (ubi0:0): background thread "ubifs_bgt0_0" started, PID 524 > [ 132.095082] UBIFS (ubi0:0): UBIFS: mounted UBI device 0, volume 0, name "test" > [ 132.102377] UBIFS (ubi0:0): LEB size: 65408 bytes (63 KiB), min./max. I/O unit sizes: 8 bytes/256 bytes > [ 132.111870] UBIFS (ubi0:0): FS size: 32573184 bytes (31 MiB, 498 LEBs), journal size 1635200 bytes (1 MiB, 25 LEBs) > [ 132.122423] UBIFS (ubi0:0): reserved for root: 1538511 bytes (1502 KiB) > [ 132.129123] UBIFS (ubi0:0): media format: w5/r0 (latest is w5/r0), UUID 2866BEC7-B74D-4793-8A66-E113C824711F, small LPT model > Using uid:0, gid:0. > Writing with putc()...done > Writing intelligently...done > Rewriting...done > Reading with getc()...done > Reading intelligently...done > start 'em...done...done...done... > Create files in sequential order...done. > Stat files in sequential order...done. > Delete files in sequential order...[ 162.282301] > [ 162.283809] ===================================== > [ 162.288514] WARNING: bad unlock balance detected! > [ 162.293221] 5.2.0-rc1-next-20190524-45490-g89d8c504132e-dirty #24 Not tainted > [ 162.300356] ------------------------------------- > [ 162.305061] bonnie++/525 is trying to release lock (&(&c->orphan_lock)->rlock) at: > [ 162.312643] [<ffff0000104a0774>] ubifs_delete_orphan+0xec/0xfc > [ 162.318476] but there are no more locks to release! > [ 162.323353] > [ 162.323353] other info that might help us debug this: > [ 162.329881] 2 locks held by bonnie++/525: > [ 162.333890] #0: 00000000a21aa66e (sb_writers#10){.+.+}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x4c > [ 162.341734] #1: 000000002fe597e5 (&c->commit_sem){++++}, at: make_reservation+0x84/0x3b4 > [ 162.349919] > [ 162.349919] stack backtrace: > [ 162.354281] CPU: 1 PID: 525 Comm: bonnie++ Not tainted 5.2.0-rc1-next-20190524-45490-g89d8c504132e-dirty #24 I see the bug, thanks a lot for reporting! But it is not in 5.2-rc1, the bad commit is so far only in linux-next. -- Thanks, //richard ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/