Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] spi-nor: s25fl512s supports region locking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tudor,

On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 4:23 PM <Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/08/2019 04:11 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 12:44 PM <Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Would you run this debug patch on top of mtd/next? I dumped the SR and CR before
> >> and after the operations in cause.
> >
> > Thanks, giving it a try...
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> >> index 73172d7f512b..20d0fdb1dc92 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> >> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
> >>  #include <linux/spi/flash.h>
> >>  #include <linux/mtd/spi-nor.h>
> >>
> >> +#define DEBUG
> >
> > Should be moved to the top of the file, before dev_dbg() is defined.
> >
> > Result is:
> >
> > m25p80 spi0.0: bfpt.dwords[1] = ffffffff
> > m25p80 spi0.0: bfpt.dwords[2] = ffffffff
> > m25p80 spi0.0: bfpt.dwords[3] = ffffffff
> > m25p80 spi0.0: bfpt.dwords[4] = ffffffff
> > m25p80 spi0.0: bfpt.dwords[5] = ffffffff
> > m25p80 spi0.0: bfpt.dwords[6] = ffffffff
> > m25p80 spi0.0: bfpt.dwords[7] = ffffffff
> > m25p80 spi0.0: bfpt.dwords[8] = ffffffff
> > m25p80 spi0.0: bfpt.dwords[9] = ffffffff
> > m25p80 spi0.0: bfpt.dwords[10] = 00000000
> > m25p80 spi0.0: bfpt.dwords[11] = 00000000
> > m25p80 spi0.0: bfpt.dwords[12] = 00000000
> > m25p80 spi0.0: bfpt.dwords[13] = 00000000
> > m25p80 spi0.0: bfpt.dwords[14] = 00000000
> > m25p80 spi0.0: bfpt.dwords[15] = 00000000
> > m25p80 spi0.0: bfpt.dwords[16] = 00000000
> > m25p80 spi0.0: failed to parse BFPT: err = -22
> > m25p80 spi0.0: spi_nor_init_params sfdp parse failed, ret =-22
> > m25p80 spi0.0: SR = 00000000
> > m25p80 spi0.0: CR = 00000002
> > m25p80 spi0.0: Erase Error occurred
> > m25p80 spi0.0: timeout while writing SR, ret = -5
> > m25p80 spi0.0: SR = 000000ff
> > m25p80 spi0.0: CR = 000000ff
>
> ff can mean that the lines are "in air", maybe the flash resets when we
> write_sr(nor, 0)? How about adding a delay here to let the flash reset?

No difference after adding msleep(1000).

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux