Re: [PATCH 4/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Fix wrongly assigned oob buffer pointer issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Miquel,

On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 11:14 +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Xiaolei,
> 
> Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon, 29 Apr 2019 14:38:33
> +0800:
> 
> > One main goal of the function mtk_nfc_update_ecc_stats is to check
> > whether sectors are all empty. If they are empty, set these sectors's
> > data buffer and oob buffer as 0xff.
> > 
> > But now, the sector oob buffer pointer is wrongly assigned. We always
> > do memset from sector 0.
> > 
> > To fix this issue, pass start secotr number to make oob buffer pointer
> 
>                                 sector
Thanks. Will change this typo.

> 
> > be properly assigned.
> 
> Please use upper case for plain English acronyms: NAND, ECC, OOB, etc.
OK.

> 
> > 
> > Fixes: 93db446a424c ("mtd: nand: move raw NAND related code to the raw/ subdir")
> 
> Same comment as before, wrong commit pointed in the Fixes tag.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> > index 7a5e8c9cf61b..cf5e50e704ae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> > @@ -873,19 +873,21 @@ static int mtk_nfc_write_oob_std(struct nand_chip *chip, int page)
> >  	return mtk_nfc_write_page_raw(chip, NULL, 1, page);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int mtk_nfc_update_ecc_stats(struct mtd_info *mtd, u8 *buf, u32 sectors)
> > +static int mtk_nfc_update_ecc_stats(struct mtd_info *mtd, u8 *buf, u32 start,
> > +				    u32 sectors)
> >  {
> >  	struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> >  	struct mtk_nfc *nfc = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
> >  	struct mtk_nfc_nand_chip *mtk_nand = to_mtk_nand(chip);
> >  	struct mtk_ecc_stats stats;
> > +	u32 reg_size = mtk_nand->fdm.reg_size;
> >  	int rc, i;
> >  
> >  	rc = nfi_readl(nfc, NFI_STA) & STA_EMP_PAGE;
> >  	if (rc) {
> >  		memset(buf, 0xff, sectors * chip->ecc.size);
> >  		for (i = 0; i < sectors; i++)
> > -			memset(oob_ptr(chip, i), 0xff, mtk_nand->fdm.reg_size);
> > +			memset(oob_ptr(chip, start + i), 0xff, reg_size);
> >  		return 0;
> >  	}
> >  
> > @@ -905,7 +907,7 @@ static int mtk_nfc_read_subpage(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> >  	u32 spare = mtk_nand->spare_per_sector;
> >  	u32 column, sectors, start, end, reg;
> >  	dma_addr_t addr;
> > -	int bitflips;
> > +	int bitflips = 0;
> >  	size_t len;
> >  	u8 *buf;
> >  	int rc;
> > @@ -972,14 +974,11 @@ static int mtk_nfc_read_subpage(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> >  	if (rc < 0) {
> >  		dev_err(nfc->dev, "subpage done timeout\n");
> >  		bitflips = -EIO;
> > -	} else {
> > -		bitflips = 0;
> > -		if (!raw) {
> > -			rc = mtk_ecc_wait_done(nfc->ecc, ECC_DECODE);
> > -			bitflips = rc < 0 ? -ETIMEDOUT :
> > -				mtk_nfc_update_ecc_stats(mtd, buf, sectors);
> > -			mtk_nfc_read_fdm(chip, start, sectors);
> > -		}
> > +	} else if (!raw) {
> > +		rc = mtk_ecc_wait_done(nfc->ecc, ECC_DECODE);
> > +		bitflips = rc < 0 ? -ETIMEDOUT :
> > +			mtk_nfc_update_ecc_stats(mtd, buf, start, sectors);
> > +		mtk_nfc_read_fdm(chip, start, sectors);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	dma_unmap_single(nfc->dev, addr, len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> 
> With this addressed:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Miquèl



______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux