Hi Miquel, Thanks for the review. I fixed all of it. On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:33:55PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > > + case NAND_OP_DATA_IN_INSTR: > > + if (!instr->ctx.data.len) > > + break; > > + buf_read = instr->ctx.data.buf.in; > > + buf_len = instr->ctx.data.len; > > + nbufs++; > > + > > + desc = gpmi_chain_data_read(this, buf_read, buf_len, > > + &direct); > > + break; > > + } > > So there is no limitation for the controller in terms of > address/data cycles that can be asserted in one go? No I think not, at least not a practical one. I can't find anything about it in the reference manual. Where is your question aiming at? Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/