On 2019/4/10 22:29, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 22:22:16 +0800 > YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 2019/4/10 21:58, Boris Brezillon wrote: >>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:39:28 +0200 >>> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:07:47 +0800 >>>> Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> Fix gcc build error while CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_BCH >>>>> is set to module: >>>>> >>>>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.o: In function `nand_cleanup': >>>>> (.text+0xef6): undefined reference to `nand_bch_free' >>>>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.o: In function `nand_scan_tail': >>>>> nand_base.c:(.text+0xa101): undefined reference to `nand_bch_calculate_ecc' >>>>> nand_base.c:(.text+0xa120): undefined reference to `nand_bch_correct_data' >>>>> nand_base.c:(.text+0xa269): undefined reference to `nand_bch_init' >>>>> >>>>> CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_BCH should not be set to M, >>>>> because MTD_RAW_NAND need it while linked. >>>>> >>>>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Fixes: 193bd4002644 ("mtd: nand: add software BCH ECC support" >>>> >>>> Nope, it's not this one that introduced the regression. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig | 2 +- >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig >>>>> index 615d738..0500c42 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig >>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig >>>>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ menuconfig MTD_RAW_NAND >>>>> if MTD_RAW_NAND >>>>> >>>>> config MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_BCH >>>>> - tristate "Support software BCH ECC" >>>>> + bool "Support software BCH ECC" >>>>> select BCH >>>>> default n >>>>> help >>>> >>>> Should be fixed with the following diff squashed into: >>>> >>>> 51ef1d0b2095 ("mtd: nand: Clarify Kconfig entry for software BCH ECC algorithm") >>>> >>>> --->8--- >>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h b/include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h >>>> index b8106651f807..06ce2b655c13 100644 >>>> --- a/include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h >>>> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h >>>> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ struct mtd_info; >>>> struct nand_chip; >>>> struct nand_bch_control; >>>> >>>> -#if defined(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_BCH) >>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_BCH) >>>> >>>> static inline int mtd_nand_has_bch(void) { return 1; } >>>> >>>> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct nand_bch_control *nand_bch_init(struct mtd_info *mtd); >>>> */ >>>> void nand_bch_free(struct nand_bch_control *nbc); >>>> >>>> -#else /* !CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_BCH */ >>>> +#else /* !CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_BCH */ >>>> >>>> static inline int mtd_nand_has_bch(void) { return 0; } >>>> >>>> @@ -64,6 +64,6 @@ static inline struct nand_bch_control *nand_bch_init(struct mtd_info *mtd) >>>> >>>> static inline void nand_bch_free(struct nand_bch_control *nbc) {} >>>> >>>> -#endif /* CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_BCH */ >>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_BCH */ >>>> >>>> #endif /* __MTD_NAND_BCH_H__ */ >>> >>> Sorry, I didn't look at the right branch, this part of the code was >>> correct, but we still have a problem to express the RAW_NAND(y) -> >>> SW_BCH(y) dependency. >> >> It seems this dependency is not always need, >> >> case MTD_RAW_NAND set to y works well while CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_BCH is not set. > > Yes, I know, but forcing nand_bch to a be a boolean is not the right > solution either, hence my suggestion to use 'imply'. Got it, Thanks, will send v2 as your suggestion. > > . > ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/