On 2019/4/10 21:58, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:39:28 +0200 > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:07:47 +0800 >> Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Fix gcc build error while CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_BCH >>> is set to module: >>> >>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.o: In function `nand_cleanup': >>> (.text+0xef6): undefined reference to `nand_bch_free' >>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.o: In function `nand_scan_tail': >>> nand_base.c:(.text+0xa101): undefined reference to `nand_bch_calculate_ecc' >>> nand_base.c:(.text+0xa120): undefined reference to `nand_bch_correct_data' >>> nand_base.c:(.text+0xa269): undefined reference to `nand_bch_init' >>> >>> CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_BCH should not be set to M, >>> because MTD_RAW_NAND need it while linked. >>> >>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Fixes: 193bd4002644 ("mtd: nand: add software BCH ECC support" >> >> Nope, it's not this one that introduced the regression. >> >> >> >>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig >>> index 615d738..0500c42 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig >>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig >>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ menuconfig MTD_RAW_NAND >>> if MTD_RAW_NAND >>> >>> config MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_BCH >>> - tristate "Support software BCH ECC" >>> + bool "Support software BCH ECC" >>> select BCH >>> default n >>> help >> >> Should be fixed with the following diff squashed into: >> >> 51ef1d0b2095 ("mtd: nand: Clarify Kconfig entry for software BCH ECC algorithm") >> >> --->8--- >> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h b/include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h >> index b8106651f807..06ce2b655c13 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h >> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/nand_bch.h >> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ struct mtd_info; >> struct nand_chip; >> struct nand_bch_control; >> >> -#if defined(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_BCH) >> +#if defined(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_BCH) >> >> static inline int mtd_nand_has_bch(void) { return 1; } >> >> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct nand_bch_control *nand_bch_init(struct mtd_info *mtd); >> */ >> void nand_bch_free(struct nand_bch_control *nbc); >> >> -#else /* !CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_BCH */ >> +#else /* !CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_BCH */ >> >> static inline int mtd_nand_has_bch(void) { return 0; } >> >> @@ -64,6 +64,6 @@ static inline struct nand_bch_control *nand_bch_init(struct mtd_info *mtd) >> >> static inline void nand_bch_free(struct nand_bch_control *nbc) {} >> >> -#endif /* CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_BCH */ >> +#endif /* CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_BCH */ >> >> #endif /* __MTD_NAND_BCH_H__ */ > > Sorry, I didn't look at the right branch, this part of the code was > correct, but we still have a problem to express the RAW_NAND(y) -> > SW_BCH(y) dependency. It seems this dependency is not always need, case MTD_RAW_NAND set to y works well while CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_BCH is not set. > > . > ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/