On Wed, 06 Feb 2019 10:22:59 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Hello Aneesh, > > > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 14:35:47 +0530 > > "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> This change helps me to get multiple mtd device registered. Without this > >> I get > >> > >> sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/bus/nvmem/devices/flash0' > >> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc2-00557-g1ef20ef21f22 #13 > >> Call Trace: > >> [c0000000b38e3220] [c000000000b58fe4] dump_stack+0xe8/0x164 (unreliable) > >> [c0000000b38e3270] [c0000000004cf074] sysfs_warn_dup+0x84/0xb0 > >> [c0000000b38e32f0] [c0000000004cf6c4] sysfs_do_create_link_sd.isra.0+0x114/0x150 > >> [c0000000b38e3340] [c000000000726a84] bus_add_device+0x94/0x1e0 > >> [c0000000b38e33c0] [c0000000007218f0] device_add+0x4d0/0x830 > >> [c0000000b38e3480] [c0000000009d54a8] nvmem_register.part.2+0x1c8/0xb30 > >> [c0000000b38e3560] [c000000000834530] mtd_nvmem_add+0x90/0x120 > >> [c0000000b38e3650] [c000000000835bc8] add_mtd_device+0x198/0x4e0 > >> [c0000000b38e36f0] [c00000000083619c] mtd_device_parse_register+0x11c/0x280 > >> [c0000000b38e3780] [c000000000840830] powernv_flash_probe+0x180/0x250 > >> [c0000000b38e3820] [c00000000072c120] platform_drv_probe+0x60/0xf0 > >> [c0000000b38e38a0] [c0000000007283c8] really_probe+0x138/0x4d0 > >> [c0000000b38e3930] [c000000000728acc] driver_probe_device+0x13c/0x1b0 > >> [c0000000b38e39b0] [c000000000728c7c] __driver_attach+0x13c/0x1c0 > >> [c0000000b38e3a30] [c000000000725130] bus_for_each_dev+0xa0/0x120 > >> [c0000000b38e3a90] [c000000000727b2c] driver_attach+0x2c/0x40 > >> [c0000000b38e3ab0] [c0000000007270f8] bus_add_driver+0x228/0x360 > >> [c0000000b38e3b40] [c00000000072a2e0] driver_register+0x90/0x1a0 > >> [c0000000b38e3bb0] [c00000000072c020] __platform_driver_register+0x50/0x70 > >> [c0000000b38e3bd0] [c00000000105c984] powernv_flash_driver_init+0x24/0x38 > >> [c0000000b38e3bf0] [c000000000010904] do_one_initcall+0x84/0x464 > >> [c0000000b38e3cd0] [c000000001004548] kernel_init_freeable+0x530/0x634 > >> [c0000000b38e3db0] [c000000000011154] kernel_init+0x1c/0x168 > >> [c0000000b38e3e20] [c00000000000bed4] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x68 > >> mtd mtd1: Failed to register NVMEM device > >> > >> With the change we now have > >> > >> /sys/bus/nvmem/devices# ls -al > >> total 0 > >> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Feb 5 12:21 . > >> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 0 Feb 5 12:21 .. > >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Feb 5 12:21 flash0 -> ../../../devices/platform/ibm,opal:flash@0/mtd/mtd0/flash0 > >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Feb 5 12:21 flash1 -> ../../../devices/platform/ibm,opal:flash@1/mtd/mtd1/flash1 > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 5 +++-- > >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c > >> index 999b705769a8..90035da3423c 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c > >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c > >> @@ -503,10 +503,11 @@ static int mtd_nvmem_reg_read(void *priv, unsigned int offset, > >> return retlen == bytes ? 0 : -EIO; > >> } > >> > >> -static int mtd_nvmem_add(struct mtd_info *mtd) > >> +static int mtd_nvmem_add(struct mtd_info *mtd, int i) > >> { > >> struct nvmem_config config = {}; > >> > >> + config.id = i; > >> config.dev = &mtd->dev; > >> config.name = mtd->name; > > > > mtd->name should be unique in the first place, otherwise mtdparts > > parsing won't work (it's using mtd->name to match the device > > partitions should be applied to) and I guess there might be other > > issues. I know it's currently not enforced, but this kind of > > situation makes me realize we should enforce it. > > > > So the right fix would be to have config.id = -1 and ensure mtd->name > > is unique at MTD registration time. > > > > Back to your specific powernv case, using DT node name doesn't work, as > > the @<id> suffix is dropped, which means all your flash devices are > > named 'flash'. > > How about > mtd->name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOFP", dev->of_node); > > That gives me flash@0 name. Is that ok? It should work. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/