On which micron part are you seeing the problem. I'm using MT29F4G16A and see similar issue. Data sheet says that erase takes from 0.7ms up to 3ms don't know if Micron tunes the delay per part or per block. Maybe on some blocks it's not enough. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
[PATCH RFC] mtd: rawnand: Cure MICRON NAND partial erase
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: [PATCH RFC] mtd: rawnand: Cure MICRON NAND partial erase
- From: "Wojtaszczyk, Piotr" <WojtaszczykP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:26:58 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Cc: "tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <mailman.5261.1543570682.2376.linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
- References: <mailman.5261.1543570682.2376.linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH RFC] mtd: rawnand: Cure MICRON NAND partial erase
- From: Thomas Gleixner
- Re: [PATCH RFC] mtd: rawnand: Cure MICRON NAND partial erase
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] mtd: physmap_of_gemini: Handle pin control
- Next by Date: [PATCH RFC] mtd: rawnand: Cure MICRON NAND partial erase issue
- Previous by thread: [GIT PULL] mtd: Fixes for 4.20-rc5
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC] mtd: rawnand: Cure MICRON NAND partial erase
- Index(es):
 |