On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:55:36 +0100 Martin Lund <martin.lund@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Naga, > > Just a few review comments for the v12 version. > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 6:00 AM Naga Sureshkumar Relli > <naga.sureshkumar.relli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > +#define PKT_OFST 0x00 > > +#define PKT_CNT_SHIFT 12 > > + > > +#define MEM_ADDR1_OFST 0x04 > > +#define MEM_ADDR2_OFST 0x08 > > For the sake of readability I think *_OFFSET is preferred, especially > since the driver already includes short macro names. I think this is > similar to the EVNT vs EVENT point. > The majority of drivers in the Linux kernel do not shorten OFFSET -> OFST. > > > > +static void anfc_rw_pio_op(struct mtd_info *mtd, u8 *buf, int len, > > + bool do_read, int prog, int pktcount, int pktsize) > > +{ > > + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd); > > + struct anfc_nand_controller *nfc = to_anfc(chip->controller); > > + struct anfc_nand_chip *achip = to_anfc_nand(chip); > > + u32 *bufptr = (u32 *)buf; > > + u32 cnt = 0, intr = 0; > > + > > + anfc_config_dma(nfc, 0); > > + > > + if (pktsize == 0) > > + pktsize = len; > > + > > + anfc_setpktszcnt(nfc, pktsize, pktcount); > > + > > + if (!achip->strength) > > + intr = MBIT_ERROR; > > + > > + if (do_read) > > + intr |= READ_READY; > > + else > > + intr |= WRITE_READY; > > + anfc_enable_intrs(nfc, intr); > > + writel(prog, nfc->base + PROG_OFST); > > + while (cnt < pktcount) { > > + anfc_wait_for_event(nfc); > > + cnt++; > > + if (cnt == pktcount) > > + anfc_enable_intrs(nfc, XFER_COMPLETE); > > + if (do_read) > > + ioread32_rep(nfc->base + DATA_PORT_OFST, bufptr, > > + pktsize / 4); > > + else > > + iowrite32_rep(nfc->base + DATA_PORT_OFST, bufptr, > > + pktsize / 4); > > + bufptr += (pktsize / 4); > > + if (cnt < pktcount) > > + anfc_enable_intrs(nfc, intr); > > + } > > + anfc_wait_for_event(nfc); > > +} > > Throughout the driver all calls to anfc_wait_for_event() ignores the > timeout return value. It would be nice to see some error handling in > case it times out - at minimum consider printing out an error message > since timeout on NAND operations are fairly critical and should > generally not occur. Perhaps even an argument can be made for > returning -ETIMEDOUT in case of timeout. Yes please, check anfc_wait_for_event() return code and propagate the error to the upper layer. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/