On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:48:11 +0000 <Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> + > >>> > >>> Maybe I missed something but it sounds like this change is just > >>> optimizing the SPMT parsing a bit, and to be honest, I'm not sure this > >>> is really needed. Most of the time, smpt_len will be rather small, so > >>> trying to bail out earlier is not bringing much perf improvements. > >> > >> It's rather a smtp validity check. I want to return an error if there are not > >> enough detection commands to identify the map id. > > > > You would have failed the same way without this validity check after a > > maximum of smpt_len iterations, right? > > > > Right. The correct fix would be to count nmaps in a loop, then do these checks, > and if all ok, search for the map_id in another loop :). Or just error out when !ncmds && nmaps > 1. If you insist on keeping the ncmds && nmaps >= (1 << (ncmds + 1)) check, that's fine, but it's not replacing the consistency check I was doing ;-). ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/