On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 02:59:20PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The SPI framework changes definitely look OK to me, if everyone agrees > > that this is a good way to go from a MTD point of view I'm happy to > > apply them. I have no strong opinion on the MTD bits of the series. > Actually, Yogesh posted similar patches before me, so maybe you can > look at this series [1]. The spi/spi-mem side of things is rather > uncontroversial. Feel free to apply them if you think they're good > enough to go in. Ugh, unfortunately he didn't send me them so I'll have to try to find them on the list and it looks like there's been no review from any of the other MTD people. It'd be good to get some consensus, yours seems a bit more complete so my inclination would be to go that way.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
