Re: [PATCH RFC 00/18] mtd: spi-nor: Proposal for 8-8-8 mode support

[Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Mark,

On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 13:25:27 +0100
Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 10:48:07AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> 
> > First question that might come to mind is why should we support such
> > stateful modes? If you think about it, the gain of transmitting the
> > opcode on 8 IO lines is rather small compared to the pain it is to
> > teach the SPI NOR framework how to deal with that. The problem is,
> > some SPI NOR manufacturers (Macronix for instance) only implement 1-1-1
> > and 8-8-8 (or 8D-8D-8D), and they want to be able to use their NORs in
> > 8-8-8 mode when the controller supports it.  
> 
> The SPI framework changes definitely look OK to me, if everyone agrees
> that this is a good way to go from a MTD point of view I'm happy to
> apply them.  I have no strong opinion on the MTD bits of the series.

Actually, Yogesh posted similar patches before me, so maybe you can
look at this series [1]. The spi/spi-mem side of things is rather
uncontroversial. Feel free to apply them if you think they're good
enough to go in.

Thanks for your review.

Boris

[1]http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-mtd/list/?series=70822

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/