From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@xxxxxxxxx> It is preferred to have the positive statement on an if/else. While we are at it we replace the way we access rom_probe_types. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Changes in v2: - New patch --- drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-core.c | 17 ++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-core.c b/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-core.c index 11e6239aadc7..33b77bd9022c 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-core.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-core.c @@ -437,7 +437,6 @@ static int physmap_flash_pdata_init(struct platform_device *dev) static int physmap_flash_probe(struct platform_device *dev) { struct physmap_flash_info *info; - const char * const *probe_type; int err = 0; int i; @@ -519,14 +518,18 @@ static int physmap_flash_probe(struct platform_device *dev) simple_map_init(&info->maps[i]); } - probe_type = rom_probe_types; - if (!info->probe_type) { - for (; !info->mtds[i] && *probe_type; probe_type++) - info->mtds[i] = do_map_probe(*probe_type, - &info->maps[i]); - } else { + if (info->probe_type) { info->mtds[i] = do_map_probe(info->probe_type, &info->maps[i]); + } else { + int j; + + for (j = 0; ARRAY_SIZE(rom_probe_types); j++) { + info->mtds[i] = do_map_probe(rom_probe_types[j], + &info->maps[i]); + if (info->mtds[i]) + break; + } } if (!info->mtds[i]) { -- 2.14.1 ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/