Hi Tudor, > -----Original Message----- > From: Tudor Ambarus [mailto:tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:31 PM > To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx>; Boris Brezillon > <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxx>; marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx; > dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx; richard@xxxxxx; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Cristian.Birsan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI > NOR flash memories > > Hi, Yogesh, > > On 10/17/2018 10:46 AM, Yogesh Narayan Gaur wrote: > > Hi Boris, > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx] > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:00 PM > >> To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxx>; Tudor Ambarus > >> <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx; > >> dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx; richard@xxxxxx; > >> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >> cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >> linux-arm- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Cristian.Birsan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform > >> SFDP SPI NOR flash memories > >> > >> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:10:45 +0200 > >> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:07:24 +0200 > >>> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 02:07:43 +0000 > >>>> Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> Actually there is no entry of s25fs512s in current spi-nor.c file. > >>>>> For my connected flash part, jedec ID read points to s25fl512s. I > >>>>> have asked my board team to confirm the name of exact connected > >>>>> flash part. When I check the data sheet of s25fs512s, it also > >>>>> points to the same Jedec ID information. { "s25fl512s", > >>>>> INFO(0x010220, 0x4d00, 256 > >>>>> * 1024, 256, ....} > >>>>> > >>>>> But as stated earlier, if I skip reading SFDP or read using 1-1-1 > >>>>> protocol then read are always correct. For 1-4-4 protocol read are > >>>>> wrong and on further debugging found that Read code of 0x6C is > >>>>> being send as opcode instead of 0xEC. > >>>>> > >>>>> If I revert this patch, reads are working fine. > >>>> > >>>> Can you try with the following patch? > >>>> > >>> > >>> Hm, nevermind. The problem is actually not related to 4B vs non-4B > >>> mode but 1-1-4 vs 1-4-4 modes. > > Yes, that's only I have stated in my first mail that instead of 1-4-4 mode read > opcode is being sent for 1-1-4 mode. > >>> > >> > >> Can you try with this patch applied? > >> > > With suggested patch, read for protocol 1-4-4 working correctly. > > > > [ 1.625360] m25p80 spi0.0: found s25fl512s, expected m25p80 > > [ 1.631094] m25p80 spi0.0: failed to parse SMPT (err = -22) > > [ 1.636661] 261 8c4c780 opcode(read:eb, pp:2, erase:d8) > > [ 1.641878] 266 8c4c780 opcode(read:ec, pp:12, erase:dc) > > [ 1.647200] m25p80 spi0.0: s25fl512s (65536 Kbytes) > > > > Without this patch, param_headers are getting freed and restoring previous > erase map i.e. opcode related to 1-1-4 protocol. > > > > Can you add some prints in spi_nor_parse_smpt() to isolate what's failing? We > should understand whether it's something wrong in spi_nor_parse_smpt() or the > s25fs512s smpt table does not respect the standard. > It's returning failure from below point in func spi_nor_get_map_in_use() /* Find the matching configuration map */ while (SMPT_MAP_ID(smpt[i]) != map_id) { if (smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_END) { printk("%d %s \n", __LINE__, __func__); goto out; } -- Regards Yogesh Gaur. > Thanks, > ta > ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/