Hi Naga, On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:50:31 +0530 Naga Sureshkumar Relli <naga.sureshkumar.relli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > +static int anfc_read_param_get_feature_sp_read_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, > + const struct nand_subop > + *subop) > +{ > + const struct nand_op_instr *instr; > + struct anfc_nand_controller *nfc = to_anfc(chip->controller); > + unsigned int op_id, len; > + struct anfc_op nfc_op = {}; > + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip); > + struct anfc_nand_chip *achip = to_anfc_nand(chip); > + u32 dma_mode, addrcycles, write_size; > + > + anfc_parse_instructions(chip, subop, &nfc_op); > + instr = nfc_op.data_instr; > + op_id = nfc_op.data_instr_idx; > + > + if (nfc_op.cmds[0] == NAND_CMD_PARAM) { > + nfc->prog = PROG_RDPARAM; > + dma_mode = 0; > + addrcycles = 1; > + write_size = 0; > + } > + if (nfc_op.cmds[0] == NAND_CMD_GET_FEATURES) { > + nfc->prog = PROG_GET_FEATURE; > + dma_mode = 0; > + addrcycles = 1; > + write_size = 0; > + } > + if (nfc_op.cmds[0] == NAND_CMD_READ0) { > + nfc->prog = PROG_PGRD; > + addrcycles = achip->raddr_cycles + achip->caddr_cycles; > + write_size = mtd->writesize; > + dma_mode = 1; > + } > + Sorry, but I still don't understand why nfc->prog is different. Did you try using PROG_PGRD for all these ops? I mean, the sequence is the same, and you keep passing the opcode and the number of address cycles to the engine using other reg fields. Also, you're not using the addrcycles info provided by the the address instruction and instead deduce it based on the opcode, which is wrong. To make it clearer, I'd like to avoid those nfc_op.cmds[0] == NAND_OPCODE tests, because it's exactly the kind of things we were trying to get rid off by introducing the ->exec_op() interface. > + anfc_prepare_cmd(nfc, nfc_op.cmds[0], 0, dma_mode, write_size, > + addrcycles); > + anfc_setpagecoladdr(nfc, nfc_op.row, nfc_op.col); > + > + if (!nfc_op.data_instr) > + return 0; > + > + len = nand_subop_get_data_len(subop, op_id); > + anfc_rw_pio_op(mtd, nfc->buf, roundup(len, 4), 1, nfc->prog, 1, 0); > + memcpy(instr->ctx.data.buf.in, nfc->buf, len); > + > + return 0; > +} ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/