On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 8:29 AM Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So, I do understand your need for conservativeness, but, after so much > evidence on single-queue devices, and so many years! :), what's the > point in keeping Linux worse for virtually everybody, by default? I understand if we need to ease things in as well, I don't intend this change for the current merge window or anything, since v4.19 will notably have this patch: commit d5038a13eca72fb216c07eb717169092e92284f1 Author: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed Jul 4 10:53:56 2018 +0200 scsi: core: switch to scsi-mq by default It has been more than one year since we tried to change the default from legacy to multi queue in SCSI with commit c279bd9e406 ("scsi: default to scsi-mq"). But due to issues with suspend/resume and performance problems it had been reverted again with commit cbe7dfa26eee ("Revert "scsi: default to scsi-mq""). In the meantime there have been a substantial amount of performance improvements and suspend/resume got fixed as well, thus we can re-enable scsi-mq without a significant performance penalty. Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> I guess that patch can be a bit scary by itself. But IIUC it all went fine this time! But hey, if that works, that means $SUBJECT patch will enable BFQ on all libata devices and any SCSI that is single queue as well, not just "obscure" stuff like MMC/SD and UBI, and that is indeed a massive crowd of legacy devices. But we're talking v4.21 here. Johannes, you might be interested in $SUBJECT patch. It'd be nice to hear what SUSE people have to add, since they are pretty proactive in this area. Yours, Linus Walleij ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/