Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: marvell: check for RDY bits after enabling the IRQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Chris,

On 27/9/2018 11:55 PM, Chris Packham wrote:
On 27/09/18 20:56, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:11:45 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Daniel,

Daniel Mack <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Thu, 27 Sep 2018 09:17:51
+0200:

At least on PXA3xx platforms, enabling RDY interrupts in the NDCR register
will only cause the IRQ to latch when the RDY lanes are changing, and not
in case they are already asserted.

This means that if the controller finished the command in flight before
marvell_nfc_wait_op() is called, that function will wait for a change in
the bit that can't ever happen as it is already set.

To address this race, check for the RDY bits after the IRQ was enabled,
and complete the completion immediately if the condition is already met.

This fixes a bug that was observed with a NAND chip that holds a UBIFS
parition on which file system stress tests were executed. When
marvell_nfc_wait_op() reports an error, UBI/UBIFS will eventually mount
the filesystem read-only, reporting lots of warnings along the way.

Fixes: 02f26ecf8c77 mtd: nand: add reworked Marvell NAND controller driver
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

Sorry I haven't had the time to check on my Armada, but you figured it
out, and the fix looks good to me!

Acked-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Boris, do you plan to send another fixes PR of can I take it into
the nand/next branch?

Queued to mtd/master.

After fixing my R/B configuration I get a new error with this patch when
running stress_1 from mtd-utils-2.0.0. I don't see this without the patch.

That's strange. So your controller sets the RDY bits before it is ready? Could you check whether only checking for NDSR_RDY(0) changes anything? Not sure about the handling of NDSR_RDY(1) in this driver anyway ...

Also, does my .EALREADY approach (v1) make any difference?


Thanks,
Daniel

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux