On 27/09/18 11:33, Chris Packham wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 27/09/18 09:24, Daniel Mack wrote: >> At least on PXA3xx platforms, enabling RDY interrupts in the NDCR register >> will only cause the IRQ to latch when the RDY lanes are changing, and not >> in case they are already asserted. >> >> This means that if the controller finished the command in flight before >> marvell_nfc_wait_op() is called, that function will wait for a change in >> the bit that can't ever happen as it is already set. >> >> To mitigate this race, check for the RDY bits after the IRQ was enabled, >> and only sleep on the condition if the controller isn't ready yet. >> >> This fixes a bug that was observed with a NAND chip that holds a UBIFS >> parition on which file system stress tests were executed. When >> marvell_nfc_wait_op() reports an error, UBI/UBIFS will eventually mount >> the filesystem read-only, reporting lots of warnings along the way. >> >> Fixes: 02f26ecf8c77 mtd: nand: add reworked Marvell NAND controller driver >> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c | 14 +++++++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c >> index 666f34b58dec..e96ec7b9a152 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c >> @@ -613,7 +613,8 @@ static int marvell_nfc_wait_cmdd(struct nand_chip *chip) >> static int marvell_nfc_wait_op(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned int timeout_ms) >> { >> struct marvell_nfc *nfc = to_marvell_nfc(chip->controller); >> - int ret; >> + int ret = -EALREADY; > > Won't this cause us to hit the if (!ret) below if we don't end up > calling wait_for_completion_timeout()? Nope boolean logic fail. > In fact I did just hit something > like this on my Armada-385 based board > > marvell-nfc f10d0000.nand-controller: Timeout waiting for RB signal > ubi0 warning: do_sync_erase: error -5 while erasing PEB 755, retry > But this still might be something else, it doesn't happen regularly. For what it's worth Tested-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> + u32 st; >> >> /* Timeout is expressed in ms */ >> if (!timeout_ms) >> @@ -622,8 +623,15 @@ static int marvell_nfc_wait_op(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned int timeout_ms) >> init_completion(&nfc->complete); >> >> marvell_nfc_enable_int(nfc, NDCR_RDYM); >> - ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&nfc->complete, >> - msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms)); >> + >> + /* >> + * Check if the NDSR_RDY bits have already been set before the >> + * interrupt was enabled. >> + */ >> + st = readl_relaxed(nfc->regs + NDSR); >> + if (!(st & (NDSR_RDY(0) | NDSR_RDY(1)))) >> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&nfc->complete, >> + msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms)); >> marvell_nfc_disable_int(nfc, NDCR_RDYM); >> marvell_nfc_clear_int(nfc, NDSR_RDY(0) | NDSR_RDY(1)); >> if (!ret) { >> > > ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/