[PATCH RFC API ONLY] mtd: get parsers from lookup table

[boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx (Boris Brezillon)]

Hi Rafal,

On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 13:17:12 +0200
Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5 at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Rafa? Mi?ecki <rafal at milecki.pl>
> 
> Existing implementation of specifying flash device parsers became a bit
> hacky and needs a cleanup. Currently it requires:
> 1) Passing parsers in a custom platform data by arch code
> or
> 2) Hardcoding parsers table in a flash driver
> 
> The purpose of the new implementation is to:
> 1) Clean up flash drivers
> 2) Have a generic solution
> 3) Avoid code duplication
> 
> That new implementation assigns table of parsers to a MTD's parent
> device. That way flash driver doesn't have to take care of passing
> parsers. It's inspired by GPIO lookup table.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki <rafal at milecki.pl>
> ---
> It's obviously a RFC patch only. It doesn't really implement anything.
> It DOESN'T COMPILE.
> 
> I'd like to know if you like this idea and if it's worth for me to
> actually spend time implementing it.

I love the idea. Actually, I'd like to extend that to fixed partition
definitions (those passed to mtd_device_register()) so that they can be
parsed by the fixed-partition parser (the one already taking care of
compatible = "fixed-partitions").

One comment below.

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-pxa/corgi.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
>  drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c     |  4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/corgi.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/corgi.c
> index 9a5a35e90769..0ff77e078d2b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/corgi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/corgi.c
> @@ -615,16 +615,8 @@ static struct nand_bbt_descr sharpsl_bbt = {
>  	.pattern = scan_ff_pattern
>  };
>  
> -static const char * const probes[] = {
> -	"cmdlinepart",
> -	"ofpart",
> -	"sharpslpart",
> -	NULL,
> -};
> -
>  static struct sharpsl_nand_platform_data sharpsl_nand_platform_data = {
>  	.badblock_pattern	= &sharpsl_bbt,
> -	.part_parsers		= probes,
>  };
>  
>  static struct resource sharpsl_nand_resources[] = {
> @@ -688,6 +680,16 @@ static struct i2c_board_info __initdata corgi_i2c_devices[] = {
>  	{ I2C_BOARD_INFO("wm8731", 0x1b) },
>  };
>  
> +static struct mtd_parser_lookup_table corgi_mtd_parser_lookup_table = {
> +	.dev_name = NULL, /* Set with registered name */

Can't you guess the device name? It's really weird that you have to
register the lookup table after the device has been registered. I
already had a similar discussion on GPIO lookup tables registration on
ams-delta here [1], and I think my comments apply to this case as well.

> +	.table = {
> +		{ .parser = "cmdlinepart" },
> +		{ .parser = "ofpart" },
> +		{ .parser = "sharpslpart" },
> +		{ },
> +	},
> +};
> +
>  static void corgi_poweroff(void)
>  {
>  	if (!machine_is_corgi())
> @@ -740,6 +742,9 @@ static void __init corgi_init(void)
>  
>  	platform_add_devices(devices, ARRAY_SIZE(devices));
>  
> +	corgi_mtd_parser_lookup_table.dev_name = dev_name(&sharpsl_nand_device.dev);
> +	mtd_parsers_add_lookup_table(corgi_mtd_parser_lookup_table);
> +
>  	regulator_has_full_constraints();
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> index 52e2cb35fc79..0d96857a57d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> @@ -936,6 +936,10 @@ int parse_mtd_partitions(struct mtd_info *master, const char *const *types,
>  	struct mtd_part_parser *parser;
>  	int ret, err = 0;
>  
> +	if (!types) {
> +		types = mtd_parsers_get(master->dev.parent);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!types)
>  		types = mtd_is_partition(master) ? default_subpartition_types :
>  			default_mtd_part_types;

Regards,

Boris

[1]https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/920798/