On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 06:00:46AM +0000, nmi wrote: > Hi Luis, > > On Monday, July 8th, 2024 at 23:42, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I'm starting to feel the same way about modules, but modules requires > > more work than the firmware loader. And since I also know Andreas has > > already a lot on his plate, I'm at a cross roads. My above request for > > the firmware loader made sense to the person working on the firmware > > loader changes, but who would help on the modules side of things? And > > does this request make sense to help scale? > > > > The rationale here is that a rust binding means commitment then also > > from fresh blood to help co-maintain review C / Rust for exising code > > when there is will / desire to collaborate from an existing C maintainer. > > > > I realize this may be a lot to ask, but I think this is one of the > > responsible ways to ask to scale here. > > I am not sure I am the right person for the task, because as you say, > I have a lot on my plate. But perhaps lets schedule a call so I can > get a sense of the required effort. Kernel development is done through emails, not calls :) If a submitter isn't willing to maintain the code they submit, then it should be rejected as maintance is the most important part. Sorry, greg k-h
