On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 09:04:27AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 08:26:18AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > So I realize why you use atomic64, but I really suspect you'd be > > better off with just the regular "atomic_long". > > <-- snip --> > > > So something like > > > > debugfs_create_ulong(... &val->counter ..); > > > > instead of > > > > debugfs_create_atomic64(... &val ..); > > > > Hmm? > > We already have debugfs_create_ulong(), it just uses unsigned long > with no atomic_long. I can just use that then. Oh but I don't get the atomic incs, so we'd need debugfs_create_atomic_long_t(). Luis
