On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 08:26:18AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So I realize why you use atomic64, but I really suspect you'd be > better off with just the regular "atomic_long". <-- snip --> > So something like > > debugfs_create_ulong(... &val->counter ..); > > instead of > > debugfs_create_atomic64(... &val ..); > > Hmm? We already have debugfs_create_ulong(), it just uses unsigned long with no atomic_long. I can just use that then. Luis
