On 15.11.22 20:29, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 04:45:05PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:Note that I don't think the issue I raised is due to 6e6de3dee51a. I don't have the machine at hand right now. But, again, I doubt this will fix it.There are *more* modules processed after that commit. That's all. So testing would be appreciated.
I'll try to get a grab on a suitable system. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb