Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 05:57:35AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: >> >> >> Le 11/07/2022 à 21:07, Luis Chamberlain a écrit : >> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 06:33:08PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Le 11/07/2022 à 18:20, Luis Chamberlain a écrit : >> >>> This moves all the module symbols from init/Kconfig to its >> >>> own dedicated file now that we have all of the module code in >> >>> its own directory. >> >>> >> >>> This does not introduce any functional changes. >> >>> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> >> It is similar to the patch I sent in February, isn't it ? >> >> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-modules/patch/4042712961d42186c449734c253511ea7076c780.1645543105.git.christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx/) >> > >> > Sorry, I had missed that. Can you send a new v2 based on today's >> > modules-next? And I'll just drop my patch? >> > >> >> I sent out v2 rebased on today's modules-next >> (c76654e22da1e0cb830bd0eb5832072fb76df358) >> >> I see all my patches still have status 'new' in modules's patchwork >> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-modules/list/?submitter=192363). >> >> Don't you maintain it ? > > Yes but I never knew we used to have patchwork for modules, but glad we have > that now. Anyway all your patches are applied, is patchwork dumb to not > pick that up? patchwork does not have that functionality built in, you need to enable the bot separately: https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
