On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 05:57:35AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 11/07/2022 à 21:07, Luis Chamberlain a écrit : > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 06:33:08PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > >> > >> > >> Le 11/07/2022 à 18:20, Luis Chamberlain a écrit : > >>> This moves all the module symbols from init/Kconfig to its > >>> own dedicated file now that we have all of the module code in > >>> its own directory. > >>> > >>> This does not introduce any functional changes. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> It is similar to the patch I sent in February, isn't it ? > >> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-modules/patch/4042712961d42186c449734c253511ea7076c780.1645543105.git.christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx/) > > > > Sorry, I had missed that. Can you send a new v2 based on today's > > modules-next? And I'll just drop my patch? > > > > I sent out v2 rebased on today's modules-next > (c76654e22da1e0cb830bd0eb5832072fb76df358) > > I see all my patches still have status 'new' in modules's patchwork > (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-modules/list/?submitter=192363). > > Don't you maintain it ? Yes but I never knew we used to have patchwork for modules, but glad we have that now. Anyway all your patches are applied, is patchwork dumb to not pick that up? Luis