On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:23:53PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Tom Gundersen <teg@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Lucas De Marchi > > <lucas.de.marchi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Tom Gundersen <teg@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> udev will only manage static nodes that exist at the time udev is started, so > >>> creating static nodes later on will likely not behave as expected. In > >>> particular, recreating the static nodes at run-time will reset any permissions > >>> udev may have applied to the nodes at boot. > >>> > >>> See <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147248> and the discussion > >>> following <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.systemd.devel/23795>. > >>> > >>> Note that this requires (the yet to be released) systemd v217 or a backport > >>> of systemd patch 8c94052ee543c3598a3c7b0c46688150aa2c6168. > >> > >> Is this patch going to systemd-stable? > > > > I think that makes sense, as the current status is broken in distros. > > Not entirely sure though, as the --boot logic is new functionality. > > Zbigniew, what do you think? Yeah, I'll pull it into -stable. (But the kmod patch doesn't really depend on your patch 'units: tmpfiles-setup-dev - allow unsafe file creation to happen in /dev at boot', just on the --boot functionality, which I think was done for F20, so can be considered available.) Zbyszek > Sorry, I misread the commit logs. The --boot logic is already in > stable, and I think my follow up patch should also go there. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-modules" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
