Re: [announce] python-kmod 0.9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:12:26AM -0700, Andy Grover wrote:
> On 03/24/2014 05:02 AM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> >I've just pushed a branch named "python" which contains the python
> >bindings. I did it a bit different than you:
> >
> >  - All the code from your repository was imported maintaining the
> >history. I would like to keep it, so I did a merge of the final import
> >(fast forward, but forced to contain a commit).
> >  - Python bindings are built with autotools. This allows to easily
> >express the dependency with libkmod... but I'm not sure this is ideal
> >as opposed to having a target to explicitely calling setuptools.  Any
> >opinion?
> >
> >Then I noticed the example given in the README file doesn't work.
> >Neither by installing they original python-kmod package :-/
> >
> >     >>> import kmod
> >     >>> km = kmod.Kmod()
> >     Traceback (most recent call last):
> >       File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> >     AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'Kmod'
> >     >>> dir(kmod)
> >     ['__builtins__', '__doc__', '__file__', '__loader__', '__name__',
> >'__package__', '__path__', '__version__', 'list', 'version']
> >
> 
> The old 'python-kmod' pkg works for me:
> 
> [agrover@work ~/.../python/kmod ((fac4d09...))]$ ipython
> 
> In [1]: import kmod
> 
> In [2]: km = kmod.Kmod()
> 
> In [3]: sc = list(km.lookup("soundcore"))[0]
> 
> In [4]: sc.path
> Out[4]: u'/lib/modules/3.13.6-200.fc20.x86_64/kernel/sound/soundcore.ko'
> 
> but when I try to use the new stuff:
> 
> [agrover@work ~/.../python/kmod ((fac4d09...))]$
> PYTHONPATH="/home/agrover/git/kmod/libkmod/python/kmod/.libs" ipython
> 
> In [1]: import kmod
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ImportError                               Traceback (most recent call last)
> <ipython-input-1-ff824b795612> in <module>()
> ----> 1 import kmod
> 
> ImportError: dynamic module does not define init function (initkmod)
> 
> Is this what you're seeing as well?


humn... indeed. The error was obfuscated for me because in the
__init__.py you catch the exception and make it pass silently.

In the build system I was inheriting the CFLAGS from the library and
unfortunately PyMODINIT_FUNC doesn't include the visibility attribute.
Since we use -fvisibility=hidden by default, this was breaking the
module.

It's working now, though I don't like to let it as -fvisibility=default.

I just pushed the python branch again. Could you ack on it?

thanks

-- 
Lucas De Marchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-modules" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux