On Friday 2012-09-21 23:41, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > >While fixing a bug in kmod related to using compressed modules (that >already existed in module-init-tools) we stopped to think about these >questions. Dave made a couple of benchmarks and performance wise it's >better to use uncompressed modules than modules with gz or xz >compression. However the benchmark was done in only 1 computer. I do >expect people with slow storage to have different numbers though. Does >anyone have these numbers? What benchmark should be run? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-modules" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
