Hey, I'd like to ask people the following question: why are you using compressed modules? Is it only for the disk space or is there any performance related reason? While fixing a bug in kmod related to using compressed modules (that already existed in module-init-tools) we stopped to think about these questions. Dave made a couple of benchmarks and performance wise it's better to use uncompressed modules than modules with gz or xz compression. However the benchmark was done in only 1 computer. I do expect people with slow storage to have different numbers though. Does anyone have these numbers? About the bug, I think it's fixed in http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-modules/msg00846.html. Need to test a bit more before rolling out a new release. Regards, Lucas De Marchi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-modules" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
