On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 14:51:52 -0600 David Lechner <dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 1/31/25 2:38 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > >> So I'm proposing that we add a gpiods_set_array_value_cansleep() > >> function that is a wrapper around gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep() > >> that has struct gpio_descs as the first parameter to make it a bit > >> easier to read the code and avoid the hard-coding temptation. > > > > This looks reasonable. > > > > How do you plan to get it merged, since you cross a lot of subsystems > > here. > > > > Andrew > > Since these are mostly small changes and most of the touched drivers aren't > seeing much action, I think it would be OK for as much as possible to go through > the GPIO tree. > > We might need an immutable branch from that though since I know that iio: adc: > ad7606 is currently being actively worked on. Looks good to me (subject to requested name change from Bartosz) I'd suggest an immutable with patch 1 then up to each subsystem maintainer to pick that up or wait for next cycle. Always hard to predict what else will get worked on at this stage of a cycle. Jonathan > > If there are any patches leftover that don't get acked to go through the GPIO > tree, I can resubmit them after the next kernel release cycle since none of > this is urgent anyway. >
