On 1/31/25 2:38 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> So I'm proposing that we add a gpiods_set_array_value_cansleep() >> function that is a wrapper around gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep() >> that has struct gpio_descs as the first parameter to make it a bit >> easier to read the code and avoid the hard-coding temptation. > > This looks reasonable. > > How do you plan to get it merged, since you cross a lot of subsystems > here. > > Andrew Since these are mostly small changes and most of the touched drivers aren't seeing much action, I think it would be OK for as much as possible to go through the GPIO tree. We might need an immutable branch from that though since I know that iio: adc: ad7606 is currently being actively worked on. If there are any patches leftover that don't get acked to go through the GPIO tree, I can resubmit them after the next kernel release cycle since none of this is urgent anyway.
