On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 06:00:34AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 11:17:08AM +0800, Yuanjie Yang wrote: > > The sdhci-msm driver supports the device in both RUNNING > > and IDLE states, when eMMC/SD are not reading or writing, > > eMMC/SD are in IDLE state, the power management module > > will suspend the device(power off and reduce frequency, > > etc.), putting the device into a low-power mode. But the > > current sdhci-msm driver cannot put device enter into > > low-power mode. > > > > Enable aggressive PM capability to support runtime PM > > functionality, allowing the eMMC/SD card to enter > > lowe-power mode. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yuanjie Yang <quic_yuanjiey@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > What is the difference to [1] ? > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20241104060722.10642-1-quic_sartgarg@xxxxxxxxxxx Thanks for your reminder, I didn't notice there was already a patch. I'll check upstream first in the future. I will close this patch. > > --- > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c > > index e00208535bd1..e3444d223513 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c > > @@ -2627,6 +2627,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > } > > > > msm_host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY | MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY; > > + msm_host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM; > > > > /* Set the timeout value to max possible */ > > host->max_timeout_count = 0xF; > > -- > > 2.34.1 > > > > -- > With best wishes > Dmitry Thanks, Yuanjie
