On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 21:53, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 10:38 PM Sergei Antonov <saproj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hello, Linus! > > I see that commit 3ee0e7c3e67cab83ffbbe7707b43df8d41c9fe47 (mmc: > > moxart-mmc: Use sg_miter for PIO) leads to "BUG: scheduling while > > atomic". > > > > Can you suggest a way to rework the code and fix this problem? I can > > probably make a patch then. The waiting part of this driver needs > > improvement anyway. It calls > > wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout() without checking its > > return value. > > I have no idea why this happens, so if it solves the problem we should > revert the patch, because I do not think it is used on HIGHMEM > systems so it doesn't really need to use the sg_miter() iterator. Did we conclude that we should make a revert to fix this problem? Unfortunately I don't have the bandwidth currently to look into this myself, so I trust your opinion on the way forward. Kind regards Uffe
