On 6/15/23 17:16, Yann Gautier wrote:
On 6/15/23 15:20, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at 11:20, Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
For STM32MP25, we'll need to distinguish how is managed the delay block.
This is done through a new comptible dedicated for this SoC, as the
delay block registers are located in SYSCFG peripheral.
Signed-off-by: Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
index 1c96da04f0e53..e47b3418b6c77 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
@@ -59,6 +59,12 @@ properties:
- const: st,stm32-sdmmc2
- const: arm,pl18x
- const: arm,primecell
+ - description: Entry for STMicroelectronics variant of PL18x for
+ STM32MP25. This dedicated compatible is used by bootloaders.
What does this last sentence mean? Can we drop it?
Hi Ulf,
I just copied (and added "for STM32MP25") what was done for STM32MP1x:
- description: Entry for STMicroelectronics variant of PL18x.
This dedicated compatible is used by bootloaders.
items:
- const: st,stm32-sdmmc2
- const: arm,pl18x
- const: arm,primecell
- description: Entry for STMicroelectronics variant of PL18x for
STM32MP25. This dedicated compatible is used by bootloaders.
items:
- const: st,stm32mp25-sdmmc2
- const: arm,pl18x
- const: arm,primecell
Should I remove (or adapt) both descriptions?
Best regards,
Yann
At the time the patch was done it was really just used by bootloaders.
But as it is now used in the driver for delay block, I should remove the
second sentence.
Yann
+ items:
+ - const: st,stm32mp25-sdmmc2
+ - const: arm,pl18x
+ - const: arm,primecell
clocks:
description: One or two clocks, the "apb_pclk" and the "MCLK"
--
2.25.1
Kind regards
Uffe
