> -----Original Message----- > From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 2:12 PM > To: A, Rashmi <rashmi.a@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Michal Simek > <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-mmc <linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux > ARM <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Kishon <kishon@xxxxxx>; Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-phy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mark > Gross <mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; kris.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhou, Furong > <furong.zhou@xxxxxxxxx>; Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa > <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@xxxxxxxxx>; Hunter, Adrian > <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>; Vaidya, Mahesh R > <mahesh.r.vaidya@xxxxxxxxx>; Srikandan, Nandhini > <nandhini.srikandan@xxxxxxxxx>; Demakkanavar, Kenchappa > <kenchappa.demakkanavar@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add intel Thunder Bay SOC > support to the arasan eMMC driver > > On 09-08-21, 05:16, A, Rashmi wrote: > > > > > > > Rashmi, is it safe to apply this separately from the phy driver/dt changes? > > > Then I can queue this via my mmc tree, if you like. > > No, the phy driver/dt changes must go together with "mmc: sdhci-of- > arasan: Add intel Thunder Bay SOC support to the arasan eMMC driver" > patch. > > Why is that? > > What could happen, emmc driver will complain about phy not found and bail > right? This is right, but ideally both mmc:phy and mmc: sdhci-of-arasan driver code changes should go together > > -- > ~Vinod
